Integrating Organizational System and Contingency Theory in Educational Management: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v10i1.422Keywords:
Contingency Theory, Educational Management, Organizational System Theory, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Educational management is increasingly complex due to policy changes, technological advancements, and dynamic social demands. These conditions require management approaches that are both systemic and context-sensitive. This study aims to systematically examine the application of organisational system theory and contingency theory in educational management and to identify patterns of their integration. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A total of 33 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2015 and 2024 were retrieved from Scopus, Google Scholar, and DOAJ databases. Data were analysed using a thematic synthesis approach based on theoretical focus and implementation context. The findings indicate that organisational system theory emphasises integration, interdependence among subsystems, and organisational sustainability, while contingency theory highlights leadership flexibility and alignment between management strategies and environmental conditions. The integration of these two theories provides a more comprehensive and adaptive framework for improving educational management effectiveness, particularly within Islamic educational institutions. This study contributes to the development of context-sensitive and sustainable educational management theory.
References
Ansori, A. F., Subandi, & Syarifudin, E. (2025). Organizational, systems, and contingency theories in environmentally based education: A case study in Islamic higher education institutions. Tadris: Journal of Education and Teacher Training, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v10i1.25645
Arar, K., & Oplatka, I. (2018). Contextual leadership and educational management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216662641
Baharuddin, B., Sembiring, H., Astuti, A., & Tshabalala, Z. (2024). Strategic Leadership in Education: Navigating Change in Digital Learning Environments. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 2(6), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijen.v2i6.1744
Basuki, N. (2023). Optimizing human capital in educational management: A systems approach. Komitmen: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 4(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.15575/jim.v4i2.28606
Bush, T. (2015). Understanding instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558565
Bush, T. (2022). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management (5 ed.). SAGE Publications.
Bush, T., & Abdullah, M. (2022). Educational leadership and management in Islamic schools. Journal of Islamic Educational Management, 7(1), 1–15.
Bush, T., & Coleman, M. (2018). Leadership and strategic management in education. School Leadership & Management, 38(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1398694
Bush, T., & Crawford, M. (2020). Educational leadership and management effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 613–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20912345
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2016). School leadership and management: Theory, policy, and practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549972
Bush, T., & Heystek, J. (2021). Contextual leadership in diverse educational environments. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(4), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220921196
Bush, T., & Ismail, N. (2020). Educational management in Islamic institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(7), 1073–1088. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2020-0024
Bush, T., & Silk, M. (2022). Contextual leadership and school improvement. School Leadership & Management, 42(4), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1911686
Bush, T., & Yunus, N. (2024). Organizational integration and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2023-0112
Carvalho, M., Cabral, I., Verdasca, J. L., & Alves, J. M. (2021a). Strategy and Strategic Leadership in Education: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.706608
Cheng, Y. C. (2017). School effectiveness and organizational development. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2015-0158
Dani, R., Harahap, I. H., & Ramli, M. (2025). Practical implications of organizational theories on organizational effectiveness. Jurnal Mirai Management, 10(1), 45–60.
Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2017). Stability and change in school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 37(4), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1366436
Donaldson, L. (2010). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Sage Publications.
Figueiró, P. S., Neutzling, D. M., & Lessa, B. (2022). Education for sustainability in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 343, 130539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130539
Fradito, A., Hidayat, R., & Mulyadi, D. (2025). The impact of system theory and contingency on management and leadership systems. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 33–49.
Fullan, M. (2016). Educational change as a systemic process. Educational Leadership, 73(6), 10–15.
Gusnita, E., Ali, H., & Rosadi, K. I. (2021). Systems model in educational management. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpis.v2i2.761
Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
Hallinger, P. (2020). Analyzing the intellectual structure of educational leadership research. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2019-0039
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2016). Conceptualizing school leadership and management. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1048205
Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217707523
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2016). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9 ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Kamara, Y., & Burhanuddin, B. (2025). The Role of Educational Leaders in Enhancing Educational Transformation. International Research-Based Education Journal, 7(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.17977/um043v7i1p98-113
Karadağ, E., Bektaş, F., & Yücel, C. (2020). Organizational climate in schools. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 20(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2020.2.001
Khalifa, M. A., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (2016). Culturally Responsive School Leadership: A Synthesis of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2019a). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2019b). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Mintzberg, H. (2015). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Pearson.
Nassou, Y., & Bennani, Z. (2024). Contingency theory in management. European Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(3).16
Norawati, S., Yanti, K., Basem, Z., & Yusup, Y. (2024). The Influence of Leadership and Organizational Commitment on Teacher Performance with Motivation as an Intervening Variable. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 12(2), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.47668/pkwu.v12i2.1213
Oplatka, I. (2017). Context and contingency in educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2016-0077
Oppong, N. (2025). Innovative Strategies for Transforming Educational Leadership in the 21st Century. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 29(1), 1–3.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pelfrey, C. M., Cola, P. A., Gerlick, J. A., Edgar, B. K., & Khatri, S. B. (2022). Breaking Through Barriers: Factors That Influence Behavior Change Toward Leadership for Women in Academic Medicine. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854488
Peng, T., Wang, C., Xu, J., Dai, J., & Yu, T. (2024). Evolution and Current Research Status of Educational Leadership Theory: A Content Analysis-Based Study. SAGE Open, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241285763
Purwati, A. S., & Zulaikha, S. (2018). Contingency theory and management control systems. Performance: Jurnal Personalia dan Sistem Informasi, 25(1), 1–12.
R. Ocampo, O., Chua, E. N., & Associate Professor V, Laguna State Polytechnic University- San Pablo City Campus, Philippines. (2023). Contingency Leadership Model in a Changing Educational Landscape for an Improved Work Commitment and Performance of Classroom Executives. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 2(09). https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2023.v2i9n14
Restalillah, R. R., Hamdiah, H., Gusnia, T. G. T., Lunita, P. C. L. P. C., Amalia, A., Anjeliana, A., & Grace, P. G. P. (2024). The Influence Of The Role Of Situational Leadership In Increasing Teacher Commitment, Satisfaction And Motivation. Indonesian Educational Administration and Leadership Journal (IDEAL), 6(2), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.22437/ideal.v6i2.38543
Sain, Z. H., Eko, G., & Lawal, U. S. (2025). Balancing rationality and uncertainty. International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology, 3(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijemt.v3i1.5001
Sisouvong, V., & Pasanchay, K. (2024). Modern educational institution management strategies. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, 4(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2024.799
White, R., Johnson, L., & Smith, K. (2025). Experiential learning and social-emotional development in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01480-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurani Nurani, Junaina Junaina, Agus Pahrudin, Subandi Subandi, Encep Syafrudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Jourrnal Perspektif agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
