Struktur dan Cara Berpikir Matematika melalui Framework Connections, Recognition Patern, Identifying Similarities and Differences and Generalising (CRIG)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v8i2.296Keywords:
Cara Berpikir Matematik, CRIG, Struktur Matematika, Way of Thinking, Way of UnderstandingAbstract
Matematika dalam perspektif keterkaitan antar konsep atau materi dapat disebut sebagai ilmu tentang berpikir terstruktur dan sistematis. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengkaji strukur matematika dan berpikir matematik, salah satunya melalui framework CRIG. Metode penelitian ini adalah library research mengkaji tentang strukur matematika dan struktur berpikir matematik dan pengenalan tentang Framework Connections, Recognition Patern, Identifying Similarities and Differences and Generalising (CRIG). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa struktur matematika lebih berfokus pada aspek formal dan sistematis matematika, sedangkan struktur berpikir matematik berhubungan dengan proses mental dan kognitif yang digunakan individu dalam memahami dan menerapkan matematika. Untuk memahami struktur berpikir matematika, salah satu syaratnya memahami tentang struktur matematika dan yang utama adalah memahami materi pra syarat sebagai prior knowledge. Oleh karena itu, CRIG menjadi salah satu upaya untuk memahami struktur berpikir matematika, hal ini sebagai teknik untuk memahami matematika yang terstruktur dan sistematis.
Author Biography
Iyon Maryono, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Scopus ID: 57200558086
References
Andal, S. G. B., & Andrade, R. R. (2022). Exploring Students’ Procedural Fluency and Written Adaptive Reasoning Skills In Solving Open-Ended Problems. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 2(1), 1–25.
Bucklin, B. A., Asdigian, N. L., Hawkins, J. L., & Klein, U. (2021). Making it stick: use of active learning strategies in continuing medical education. BMC Medical Education, 21, 1–9.
Dvureĕenskij, A. (2002). Measures on quantum structures. In Handbook of measure theory (pp. 827–868). Elsevier.
Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., Van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Miarka, R., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (2016). The philosophy of mathematics education. Springer Nature.
Gardella, F. J., & Aguirre, A. C. (2006). Mathematical connections: A bridge to algebra and geometry. In McDougal Littell/Houghton Mifflin. McDougal Littell/Houghton Mifflin.
Gronow, M., Mulligan, J., & Cavanagh, M. (2020). Teachers’ understanding and use of mathematical structure. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1–26.
Gronow, M., Mulligan, J., & Cavanagh, M. (2022). Teachers’ understanding and use of mathematical structure. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(2), 215–240.
Harel, G. (2008). What is mathematics? A pedagogical answer to a philosophical question. Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy, 265–290.
Hwang, W.-Y., Chen, N.-S., Dung, J.-J., & Yang, Y.-L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191–212.
Jupri, A. (2018). Using the Van Hiele theory to analyze primary school teachers’ written work on geometrical proof problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 12117.
Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., & Gozali, S. M. (2022). Pre-Service Teachers’ Strategies in Solving Absolute Value Equations and Inequalities. Education Sciences, 12(11), 743.
Kilpatrick, J. (2020). History of research in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 349–354.
Kilpatrick, J., & Swafford, J. (2002). Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking Mathematically. Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England.
Mason, J. (2003). On the structure of attention in the learning of mathematics. Australian Mathematics Teacher, The, 59(4), 17–25.
Mason, J., Stephens, M., & Watson, A. (2009). Appreciating mathematical structure for all. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 10–32.
Netti, S. N. S., Sutawdjaja, A., Subanji, S., & Mulyati, S. (2017). Skema Berpikir Mahasiswa Ketika Mengostruksi Bukti Matematis. Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika Dan Nilai-Nilai Islami), 1(1), 547–555.
Netti, S., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., Abadyo, A., & Anwar, L. (2016). The Failure to Construct Proof Based on Assimilation and Accommodation Framework from Piaget. International Education Studies, 9(12), 12–22.
Polya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (Expanden P, Vol. 85). Princeton university press.
RamÃrez-Montoya, M. S., Andrade-Vargas, L., Rivera-Rogel, D., & Portuguez-Castro, M. (2021). Trends for the future of education programs for professional development. Sustainability, 13(13), 7244.
Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189–203.
Schoenfeld, A. H., & Sloane, A. H. (2016). Mathematical thinking and problem solving. Routledge.
Senechal, M. (1993). Mathematical structures. Science (New York, NY), 260(5111), 1170–1173.
Stacey, K. (2006). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important. Progress Report of the APEC Project: Collaborative Studies on Innovations for Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Different Cultures (II)—Lesson Study Focusing on Mathematical Thinking.
Subanji, S. (2016). Teori defragmentasi struktur berpikir dalam mengonstruksi konsep dan pemecahan masalah matematika. In Universitas Negeri Malang. UM Press.
Sukmaangara, B., & Pabrawati, M. N. (2019). Analisis struktur berpikir peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan masalah tes kemampuan berpikir kritis matematik berdasarkan dominasi otak. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers.
Susanah. (2014). Matematika dan pendidikan matematika. In Strategi pembelajaran matematika. Universitas Terbuka.
Tall, D. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media.
Wahab, A., Ahsan, M., & Busrah, Z. (2022). Defragmenting the Thinking Structure of Problem Solving Through Cognitive Mapping Based on Polya Theory on Pisa Problems. Journal of Mathematics Learning Innovation (JMLI), 1(1), 93–97.
Walker, A. L. (2021). An Analysis on Problem Solving ability of Higher Secondary School Students and Problem Solving Through Teaching. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 25, 1–2.
Wynants, S., & Dennis, J. (2018). Professional development in an online context: Opportunities and challenges from the voices of college faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), n1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish in Jourrnal Perspektif agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
