Differences in Mathematical Communication Ability and Self-Efficacy of Students Taught With Team Assisted Individualization and Think Pair Share Cooperative Learning Models Assisted by Digital Books

Authors

  • Nur Imaniyanti State Universty of Medan, Indonesia
  • Edi Syahputra State Universty of Medan, Indonesia
  • Elmanani Simamora State Universty of Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v9i2.353

Keywords:

Difference, , Communication Ability, Self Efficacy, Cooperative Learning Model.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in mathematical communication skills and self-efficacy of students taught with the TAI type cooperative learning model and the TPS learning model assisted by digital books and to determine whether there was an interaction between initial mathematical abilities and learning models on mathematical communication skills and self-efficacy. This type of research is a quasi-experimental study conducted at SMKS Muhammadiyah 8 Medan. The results of the study showed that there were significant differences in students' mathematical communication skills between the group that followed learning with the TAI model and the group that followed learning with the TPS model. Students who learned with the TAI model showed higher mathematical communication skills compared to students taught with the TPS model. There was a significant difference in student self-efficacy between the TAI and TPS learning groups. Students in the TAI group had a higher level of self-efficacy than students in the TPS group. There was no significant interaction between initial mathematical abilities and learning models on students' mathematical communication skills and self-efficacy. This shows that the influence of learning models on mathematical communication skills and self-efficacy applies consistently at all levels of initial ability, whether high, medium, or low

References

Ansari, B. (2018). Komunikasi Matematik Strategi Berfikir Dan Manajemen Belajar Konsep dan Aplikasi. PeNa.

Bandura, A. (1989). Self-efficacy mechanism in physiological activation and health-promoting behavior. In J. Madden, S. Matthysse, & J. Barchas (Eds.), Adaptation, learning and affect. Raven.

Barr, D., D. (2019). Computational thinking: A Digital Age Skill for Everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 6, 38.

Dina, Z. H., Ikhsan, M., H. (2019). The Improvement of Communication and Mathematical Disposition Abilities through Discovery Learning Model in Junior High School. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 4(1): 12.

Hamidah. (2018). Pengaruh Self Efficacy Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik. STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 2(3), 23.

Hidayat, A dan Viora, D. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think-Pair-Share Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 1 Bangkinang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, Vol. 2, No.

Ismail Hanif Batubara, Sahat Saragih, Elmanani Simamora, E Elvis Napitupulu, I. P. S. (2022). Analysis of student’s mathematical communication skills through problem based learning models assisted by augmented reality. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.3704

NCTM. (2020). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Nurullita., Surya, Edy. & Syahputra, E. (2017). The Effect Of Problem Based Learning To Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability. IJARIIE, 3(2), 3441-3446.

Papyrina, V, Strebel.J, & R. . (2020). The Student confidence gap : Gender differences in job skill self-efficacy. Sciencedirect Journal of Education for Business, 96 Issue 2, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1757593.

Rahayu, I. F., & Aini, I. N. (2021). Analisis kemandirian belajar dalam pembelajaran matematika pada siswa SMP. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 4($), 789-798.

Rahmawati, Hasri., & M. (2022). Gaya Belajar Peserta Didik Usia Dini Berprestasi Akademik. Jurnal Obsesi (Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini), 6 (6), 6384-6394.

Santri, F. (2018). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran elementer. Zigie Utama.

Selby, C., Dorling, M., Woolard, J. (2015). Evidence of Assessing Computational Thingking. IFIF TC3.

Slavin, R. E. (2018). Cooperative Learning Teori Riset dan Praktik (Nusa Media (ed.)).

Sugiyono. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Alfabeta.

Sukoco, H. (2016). Pengaruh Pendekatan Brain Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dan Self-Efficacy Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1)., 11-224.

Turmudi. (2009). Landasan filsafat dan teori pembelajaran matematika (Berparadigma eksploratif dan investigatif). PT Leuser Cita Pustaka.

Turmudi. (2019). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer (FPMIFA-UPI. (ed.).

Downloads

Published

2025-05-26

How to Cite

Imaniyanti, N., Syahputra, E., & Simamora, E. (2025). Differences in Mathematical Communication Ability and Self-Efficacy of Students Taught With Team Assisted Individualization and Think Pair Share Cooperative Learning Models Assisted by Digital Books. Jurnal Perspektif, 9(2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v9i2.353

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Perspektif

Section

Jurnal Perspektif

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Imayanti 12

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in Jourrnal Perspektif agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.